Unraveling Geopolitics: Navigating the Intricate Interplay of Power, Oil, and Alliances in a Dynamic and Unpredictable World

Commencing with the most recent U.S. elections in which Biden participated, he champions a progressive and environmentally conscious Democratic agenda geared towards a sustainable future.

This agenda appears to be propelled forward with little deliberation. It seems that Americans opted to accelerate their departure from fossil fuels hastily, potentially without thorough consideration.

Considerable financial resources have been allocated toward advancing green energy initiatives. Similarly, substantial funds have been designated for the development of electric vehicles and other related endeavors. However, these efforts are criticized for being insufficient, belated, and lacking in significant impact.

Despite warnings from Trump, the Democrats, who formerly preferred oil production abroad with environmental consequences, seem to have disregarded these concerns and favored Biden’s stance.

Biden now faces challenges in advocating for a Republican agenda, particularly given the prevalent alignment with Trump’s viewpoints.

This prompts the question: what course of action should be pursued?

Before addressing this, it’s important to reflect on our past actions.

The Khashoggi assassination, where Biden accused Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud (MBS) and Saudi Arabia in favor of the Muslim brethren, could be one of the most regrettable decisions made by a U.S. president in many decades.

Biden, who was upset with Saudi Arabia, goes to Rais (Crown Prince and Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia) to ask for forgiveness and forgiveness and this is where the most interesting story begins…

It starts politically and ends…

While visiting Israel in 2022, Biden’s administration conveyed a clear instruction to all Israeli media outlets: no handshakes would take place. The rationale behind this decision was to avoid any potential issues related to Covid-19.

Subsequently, a new video emerges, adding another layer to the story…

A perplexing scene unfolds in this situation.

Biden refrains from engaging in handshakes and then seemingly breaks the “silence” with Netanyahu. The question arises: what is the rationale behind this unconventional action? How did this come about, and who granted authorization for such a departure from the norm?

As we begin to connect the dots, a response is on the horizon — one that holds global implications and significance.

The American public is taken aback by the news that Biden has chosen not to shake hands with MBS. Additionally, the photograph featuring Netanyahu carries a weighty significance that will become apparent shortly.

The remarkable success of the Abraham Accords serves as tangible evidence of a concealed understanding between the present U.S. administration and Saudi Arabia. Biden now comprehends the array of peace offerings he can extend to the Saudis, building upon the groundwork laid by Trump. Moreover, there’s a sense that a more substantial and remarkable development could be on the horizon.

In this context, it becomes imperative for Biden to demonstrate his support for individuals who command MBS’s admiration and respect.

Saudi Arabia’s most prominent adversary is undoubtedly Iran. The religious divide is clear: Sunni Saudi Arabia versus Shiite Iran.

During his tenure, Trump decided to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal, a move that was seen as antagonistic toward Saudi Arabia’s adversary.

However, the stance shifted under Biden’s administration. Despite Saudi Arabia’s strong opposition, Biden made concerted efforts to rejoin the Iran nuclear deal, a decision that is perceived as a significant misstep.

Amidst this backdrop, there was one individual who stood out by vocally opposing and defying the international consensus concerning Iran, much to Saudi Arabia’s approval.

Amid this scenario, there emerged a singular individual who boldly stood against the prevailing international consensus regarding Iran, garnering considerable approval from Saudi Arabia.

The situation has taken a dramatic turn, Now the bomb is here, and the second one is on the way.

Unexpectedly, Russia launches an invasion of Ukraine, sending shockwaves through the international community. In response, the United States and Western powers resort to imposing sanctions on Russia, attempting to exert pressure.

This sequence of events leads to a complete upheaval, resulting in a sharp escalation of oil prices. Paradoxically, this surge in oil prices works to Russia’s advantage. Amidst a state of euphoria, Russia capitalizes on the situation by selling oil back to Europe at exorbitant rates, despite prior European efforts to boycott Russian oil.

This complex scenario begs the question: What are the underlying dynamics at play here?

Biden finds himself under intense pressure as American citizens grapple with gas prices nearing $10 per gallon at gas stations (as of 2022).

With impending elections on the horizon, a significant move is in the works: sending Biden Himself as a representative to engage with the Saudis. This choice carries profound implications.

Amid numerous individuals surrounding him, Biden carefully selects his interactions, opting to extend a handshake and even vocalize “I love you” to a specific figure. Surprisingly, it’s Netanyahu who receives this display of affection from Biden.

This occurrence raises intrigue, as it could potentially unveil one of the most guarded secrets. What transpires after Biden’s heartfelt declaration to Netanyahu? What will unfold during their 15-minute conversation?

Certainly, a succinct conversation could hold substantial weight in such circumstances.

In summary, the focus lies not solely on what Saudi Arabia might receive, but rather on what Israel stands to gain in exchange for its support at a critical juncture. This hinges on the assistance provided by the individual who vocally opposed the nuclear deal.

Remarkably, there is a shared interest among key players like MBS, Netanyahu, Putin, and potentially even the American populace in the return of Trump to power. This convergence of interests extends to those invested in the U.S. stock market, who anticipate the resurgence of record-breaking performances—a feat that has yet to materialize during Biden’s tenure.

n the face of a multitude of opposing interests, even achieving success in a given battle may not ensure a favorable outcome in the long run.

Analyzing the geopolitical landscape:

The United States seeks affordable oil, driving its relationships with energy-rich nations like Qatar and Iran. This aligns with European interests, especially considering recent tensions with Russia within the context of NATO.

Deep-rooted enmity exists between Saudi Arabia and Iran, driven by religious differences (Sunni vs. Shiite) and historical conflicts.

Qatar maintains a connection with Iran and is a staunch supporter of the Palestinians, both financially and politically. This allegiance shifts Palestinian loyalty toward Qatar rather than Saudi Arabia.

This financial aid reaches Gaza, where the population is predominantly Shiite, further complicating the regional dynamics given Saudi Arabia’s Sunni affiliation.

The intricate interplay of these factors underscores the complexity of the geopolitical map and the challenging balance of interests.

Indeed, Gaza maintains a connection to Hezbollah, which operates as an extension of Iran’s influence in the region.

Iran stands as Saudi Arabia’s primary adversary, with a history of conflict and opposition.

Israel, under the leadership of Netanyahu, has cultivated close ties with major U.S. defense companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon, thereby maintaining a significant influence on American policy.

Saudi Arabia’s substantial oil reserves have positioned them as a significant player on the global stage, while the United States seeks lower oil prices to support its economy.

The Saudis, in their pursuit of advanced weaponry, seek American-made military equipment in exchange for their oil wealth.

Meanwhile, the Saudis are engaging in strategic moves such as flirting with China and Russia, potentially as a way to exert leverage and challenge American influence.

This intricate web of relationships underscores the intricate and multifaceted nature of international politics and power dynamics.

The energy pressure is intensifying in Europe, especially as the Russian gas pipeline faces challenges. With the return of winter, energy demand is expected to rise, potentially even more so than before.

Simultaneously, tensions escalate as China’s actions point toward a potential invasion of Taiwan. This development has put the United States on alert due to Taiwan’s role as a hub for many valuable global companies.

Amidst this intricate backdrop, the Saudis are attuned to the mounting pressure. The U.S. faces a pivotal decision between aligning with Iran or Saudi Arabia.

In the background, the U.S. and Israel are crafting a contingency plan—Plan B—to weaken Iran internally through a coup, aiming for a scenario where internal discord leads to Iran’s self-destruction, subsequently easing regional tensions.

Regrettably, it seems that, in the pursuit of oil prices and military alliances, the welfare of the Palestinians might be sidelined by both the Saudis and Americans.

Curiously, it’s envisaged that this complex interplay could paradoxically pave the way for peace, albeit achieved through the process of war.

For those who perceive these intricate dynamics, the situation appears straightforward and lucid. However, if these patterns remain elusive, time will eventually reveal the underlying truths and complexities.

Saudi Arabia has long recognized the critical importance of weaponry, viewing it as not only essential for its survival but also as a means to exert control over the entire region, particularly when it comes to managing Iran.

While the Democrats in the United States have pursued an agenda of building relations with Iran, often aligned with European liberal sentiments, Saudi Arabia has actively worked to counter these efforts. The Saudis understand the influence that the U.S. holds over Europe and have taken steps to thwart any strengthening of ties between Europe and Iran, aiming to maintain their leverage in the region.

The power dynamics are such that if the U.S. opposes a certain course of action, European influence is considerably diminished. The reliance on American-supplied weapons creates a complex relationship, as nations are reluctant to quarrel with their primary arms supplier or to have weapons sold to their adversaries.

The U.S.’s genius strategic approach, exemplified by its ability to leverage military might to shape global dynamics, is a concept that European nations have struggled (haven’t grasped) to fully comprehend and capitalize on since the conclusion of World War II.

In a sense, the drive to maintain a formidable military apparatus has sometimes overshadowed the European aspiration to unify and invest in the development of a united continent.

In the grand scheme of geopolitics, these complexities and tensions reveal the intricate dance of power, interests, and diplomacy that shape the modern world.

The European nations’ choice to embrace humanitarian efforts, welcome refugees, and support Ukraine in its struggle against Russia has begun to reveal the potential pitfalls of their past decisions. As they grapple with the consequences of their actions, they are realizing the ramifications of decades spent prioritizing various causes over what truly matters in terms of security and stability.

These nations may now have to contend with the unintended outcomes of their previous stances.

Furthermore, the prospect of France and Germany effectively competing against the American F-35 aircraft is exceedingly slim. The United States holds a significant advantage in controlling Europe’s air forces, a reality that is shaping the dynamics of military capabilities in the region.

While there may be concerns about European nations asserting themselves against American influence, the realities of military strength and technology often make this a challenging proposition.

Interestingly, the Saudis have come to understand that Israel is not their adversary. On the contrary, they recognize that Netanyahu’s leadership has been beneficial for their military pursuits, especially in terms of acquiring advanced weaponry. This perspective underscores the complexities of international relationships and how geopolitical realities can lead to unexpected alliances and understandings.

1. Netanyahu has been a vocal and prominent figure in highlighting the Iranian threat, which is a significant concern for Saudi Arabia above all other considerations.

2. Furthermore, Netanyahu played a crucial role in exposing Iran’s deceptive tactics during the negotiations of the Iranian nuclear agreement. This was done by unveiling archives obtained by Mossad, revealing Iran’s hidden activities and intentions. Saudi Arabia regards this as a remarkable accomplishment and a demonstration of honor.

The Saudis have recognized Netanyahu’s role and contributions, bestowing upon him a royal honor for his efforts.

The United States, however, has faced challenges with the Iranian agreement. Biden is driven to lower oil prices in an attempt to bolster his political position for upcoming elections and to assist the broader Democratic party, which is currently grappling with revelations on platforms like Twitter and investigations by the FBI.

Netanyahu occupies a pivotal position between the Saudis and the Americans. This balance is critical, as the Saudis seek arms, the Americans strive for oil-related advantages, and Netanyahu aims to secure credit for the accomplishments achieved through these complex dynamics.

The interplay of political, strategic, and economic interests underscores the intricate relationships between these key players on the global stage.

The prospect of war carries complex implications that can impact various aspects of international dynamics, War will only accelerate the following:

1. More budgets for weapons and American dependence: A war can indeed lead to increased budgets for weapons and bolster American reliance on its military-industrial complex. In times of war, defense expenditures often rise, potentially fostering a deeper dependency on the defense industry.
2. More energy price pressure against the Saudi reserves: War could potentially create energy price pressures and strain Saudi Arabia’s reserves, as geopolitical instability can disrupt energy markets and impact oil prices.
3. Removal of the imbecile factor from the equation (Iran) will only bring quiet to the region, as the Iranians won’t sit quietly while the Saudis celebrate with the Americans.

Therefore, not only will war not only cause harm, but it will speed up and streamline the systems.

There’s nothing better for economic prosperity than being after a thriving war!